Ontario

We have found 727 items matching your search query.

Ontario

Jurisdiction:

McKinstry v. York Condominium Corporation No. 472

Mandatory mediation and arbitration (in Ontario) does not apply to oppression applications.
Jurisdiction:

Corchis v. Essex Condominium Corp. No. 28 Ontario Court of Appeal

Notice to owners not required in the case of a claim for contribution and indemnity
Jurisdiction:

Webb v. Metropolitan Toronto Condominium Corp. No. 979

Change of Television Service
Jurisdiction:

Waterloo North Condominium Corp. No. 186 v. Weidner

Pet prohibition in declaration enforced
Jurisdiction:

York Condominium Corp. No. 482 v. Christiansen

Leave to appeal refused
Jurisdiction:

Apartments International Inc. v. Metropolitan Toronto Condominium Corporation No. 1170

Appeal of “hotel use” decision
Jurisdiction:

Carleton Condominium Corp. No. 291 v. Weeks

Mediation and arbitration not mandatory for breach of the Act
Jurisdiction:

Smithers v. York Condominium Corporation No. 60

No By-law Required to Authorize Remuneration for Officers or Agents
Jurisdiction:

Smithers v. YCC No. 60 [Divisional Court] [Also summarized in Part 2 of Condo Cases Across Canada]

By-law not required for remuneration to officer or agent
Jurisdiction:

East Gate Estates Essex Condominium Corp. No. 2 v. Kimmerly

Owner’s landscaping changes exceeded Board’s authorization, and had to be reversed
Jurisdiction:

York Condominium Corporation No. 482 v. Christiansen April 3, 2003

An important case about condominium collections: Lien right applies only to unit in default. However, rents from one unit can be applied to arrears from another
Jurisdiction:

Skyline Executive Properties v. MTCC No. 1385 (December 20, 2002)

The current hot topic is the legality of short-term tenancies, better known as “hotel-like uses”. This topic has recently boiled over in Ontario.