Ontario

We have found 743 items matching your search query.

Ontario

Jurisdiction:

3716724 Canada Inc. v. CCC No. 375 (Ontario Superior Court) December 8, 2015 and February 26, 2016

Court orders condominium corporation to consent to owner’s requested change to common elements
Jurisdiction:

MTCC No. 673 v. St. George Property Management Inc. (Ontario Superior Court)

Manager ordered to pay costs incurred by condominium corporation due to inaccurate status certificate
Jurisdiction:

Toronto Standard Condominium Corp. No. 2032 v. Boudair (Ontario Superior Court)

Court awards reduced costs to condominium corporation, payable only by the tenants
Jurisdiction:

Wan v. Lau (Ontario Superior Court)

Defamation claim against condominium director dismissed
Jurisdiction:

Wexler v. Carleton Condominium Corporation No. 28 (Ontario Small Claims Court)

Owners claim against condominium corporation, in small claims Court, dismissed. Owner ordered by pay costs of $20,000
Jurisdiction:

Halton Standard Condominium Corp. No. 627 v. Grandview Living Inc. (Ontario Superior Court)

Termination of agreement entered into by developer-controlled Board was a change to the common elements requiring a vote of owners
Jurisdiction:

Carleton Condominium Corporation No. 22 v. MacQuarrie (Ontario Superior Court)

Court awards reduced costs to condominium corporation
Jurisdiction:

Trez v. Wynford (Ontario Superior Court)

Condominium corporation has no right to an equitable lien
Jurisdiction:

3716724 Canada Inc. v. CCC No. 375 (Ontario Superior Court)

Court orders condominium corporation to consent to owner’s requested change to common elements
Jurisdiction:

Couture v. TSCC No. 2187 (Ontario Superior Court)

Parking dispute results in finding of oppression against condominium corporation
Jurisdiction:

MTCC No. 985 v. Cheney (Ontario Superior Court)

Condominium corporation completed reasonable repairs to address smoke migration
Jurisdiction:

Seto v. Peel Condominium Corporation No. 492 (Ontario Superior Court)

Condominium corporation did not properly allocate common expenses; however, there was no oppression. Corporation also failed to enforce Declaration