Ontario

We have found 743 items matching your search query.

Ontario

Jurisdiction:

Gordon v. York Region Condominium Corp. No. 818 (Ontario Superior Court)

By-law establishes procedure for removal of Director by Board resolution
Jurisdiction:

Toronto Standard Condominium Corporation No. 2095 v. West Harbour City (I) Residences Corp. (Ontario Superior Court)

Agreement to limit developer’s liability, entered into by developer-controlled Board, found binding and enforceable
Jurisdiction:

Diamantopoulos v. Metropolitan Toronto Condominium Corp. No. 594 (Ontario Superior Court)

Owners’ claims dismissed as “de minimus” (ie. too trivial). Also reasonable for the corporation to ask that all board communications go through the management office
Jurisdiction:

Dhillon Group Investments Ltd. v. Peel Standard Condominium Corporation

Condominium corporation obligated to enforce declaration
Jurisdiction:

Ontario Workplace Safety and Insurance Appeals Tribunal Decision No. 1504/12 (Ontario WSI Appeals Tribunal)

Injured worker cannot claim against condominium corporation due to WSIB coverage
Jurisdiction:

673830 Ontario Ltd. v. Metropolitan Toronto Condominium 673 (Ontario Superior Court)

Status certificate issued to purchaser was accurate. Special assessment was offset by proceeds of expropriation
Jurisdiction:

Green v. York Region Condominium Corporation No. 834 (Ontario Superior Court)

Elevator maintenance company not negligent. Condominium resident’s claim for damages due to elevator malfunction dismissed
Jurisdiction:

York Condominium Corporation No. 345 vs. Qi (Ontario Superior Court)

Given the particular circumstances, condominium corporation’s costs for lien collection process to be assessed on a partial indemnity scale rather than on a solicitor-client scale
Jurisdiction:

York Condominium Corporation No. 17 v. Ge (Ontario Superior Court)

Owner in breach of requirement to use unit as single-family dwelling
Jurisdiction:

IRE-YONGE Developers Inc. v. City of Toronto (Ontario Municipal Board)

OMB refuses to approve proposed mix-use building. Four nearby condominium corporations among those opposing the proposed development